|
|
Post by davidruffinlover on Jul 27, 2005 3:09:09 GMT -5
True, I agree. Certainly would've caught a few more peoples attention then. Though, I personally think everyone did a wonderful job & wouldn't replace anyone. Howevre, some people just crazy & need to see a big stars name be4 seeing something =)
|
|
|
|
Post by davidruffinlover on Jul 28, 2005 3:08:13 GMT -5
True....well sometimes =D
|
|
|
|
Post by davidruffinlover on Jul 29, 2005 23:03:48 GMT -5
Long as leons in it....I'm happy =)
|
|
|
|
Post by davidruffinlover on Jul 30, 2005 23:14:45 GMT -5
=D Love me some Leon.
|
|
|
|
Post by lightdion on Aug 3, 2005 1:15:28 GMT -5
I would put more of Dennis in into the plot and showed them getting thier Grammies...................
|
|
|
|
Post by Jonesesgirl on Aug 3, 2005 1:25:17 GMT -5
I WOULD HAVE SHOWN MORE OF MELVINS FAMILY LIFE.
|
|
|
|
Post by lightdion on Aug 3, 2005 1:28:52 GMT -5
I WOULD HAVE SHOWN MORE OF MELVINS FAMILY LIFE. True, and Eddie's life also  |
|
|
|
Post by davidruffinlover on Aug 3, 2005 12:38:22 GMT -5
Actually, they should've had all the guys family lives shown more =) Like they failed to mention David & melvin were cousins......
|
|
|
|
Post by lightdion on Aug 4, 2005 0:53:51 GMT -5
Actually, they should've had all the guys family lives shown more =) Like they failed to mention David & melvin were cousins......  That's true, they know they coulda AT LEAST mentioned that........ |
|
|
|
Post by davidruffinlover on Aug 4, 2005 11:39:01 GMT -5
I KNOW!! At least that....that was just lazy on Otis's part not to mention even that tiny family detail!! =)
|
|
|
|
Post by Coey on Aug 4, 2005 13:00:00 GMT -5
I KNOW!! At least that....that was just lazy on Otis's part not to mention even that tiny family detail!! =) hmm ...your quite sure that was all on Otis huh? |
|
|
|
Post by lightdion on Aug 6, 2005 1:28:51 GMT -5
I KNOW!! At least that....that was just lazy on Otis's part not to mention even that tiny family detail!! =) hmm ...your quite sure that was all on Otis huh? You must know something that we don't?  |
|
|
|
Post by Coey on Aug 6, 2005 16:25:18 GMT -5
hmm ...your quite sure that was all on Otis huh? You must know something that we don't? Personally "I" don't know more then some of the *WE* in here, I certainly know more then when I first started.. but most in here have read other threads that are very enlightening as to the book, the movie, who did what..such as The rights to making the movie were sold.. Yes, Otis name appears as producer, but I can guarantee he wasnt there in person for the whole production, with the Tempts schedule it would have been impossible, they may have asked his advise on some scenes. There is also something called artistic enhancement or something like that for entertainment value. If the movie was to show the whole complete life of the Tempts it would be alot longer then 2 hours.. it would probably be a 6 month long series . Also the credits say: The preceding dramatization is a fictional account inspired by actual events. There is alot more information on various threads from members in here that are much more experienced then I in the inner workings of movies, music business, being a celebrityand in the public eye and what they go thru and of the Tempts themselves... and to quote Ivory: Ok, I finally pulled out the video and it says, in the closing credits, just what I thought it said.....
The preceding dramatization is a fictional account inspired by actual events.
I don't know how they could have been any clearer than that. Again, if someone watches the movie and is dumb enough to think that it is the gospel
truth it's not the movie's fault ........... it's the viewers.Please.. spend some time reading past posts.. you'll find out soo much about the Tempts your head will spin! You'll both find out more then you probably wanted to ever know or ever wondered about. Its very interesting. I'll try to take some time and see if I can browse thru some of the threads and post them here that I thought were very informative and in some cases very agumentative.. .. and this topic has been talked about over and over and over and over and over again.. soo do some reading or skimming over of previous posts.. have fun.. *s* |
|
|
|
Post by janebse on Aug 6, 2005 19:43:26 GMT -5
Right on, Coey. I wonder about people. The words "The preceding dramatization is a fictional account inspired by actual events" seems pretty clear to me.
And that's what all movies are and all books. No matter whether it says non-fiction or fiction. Non-fiction is the writer's interpretation of events. But then it's true of all of us. We see an accident. We report what we see, but if ten people report it, there will be ten different reports.
Get with it, people.
By the way, I've discovered on what records you can actually hear Al's voice. It's a matter of research over the years. Is anyone interested? Or is everyone happier believing whatever it is they want to believe?
|
|
|
|
Post by Coey on Aug 6, 2005 20:38:30 GMT -5
Are we interested? of course we are!!! You know we are!!! *s*
I dont have the Flip shows... yet.... I can't help ya there except to maybe search amazon for you..
|
|
